Five thousand years ago.... Prehistoric for the Western World.... Documented History in India.

Five Thousand Years Old.... Prehistoric according to the English calendar only

This is a photo taken at the 'Roman Bath',  in the city of Bath in England. This place dates back almost to the year 5 AD.

Anything that occurred before this is considered prehistoric according to the Western World...

In India, its anything but....

Two civilizations, Mohenjo Daro and Harappa are well heard of. 

But yet another beautiful kingdom existed for sure; the ruins of which have been found.... beautifully protected by the kindness of mother nature...

The Civilization is well documented in the one of the most famous epics we read... The one that existed five thousand years back....

Indian History mentions the presence of God or the avatars of God, who actually walked on earth much before the time of the great messenger Jesus Christ. This civilization actually had been home to one such messenger of God. according to mythology. 

Read more about this real life place in the Science Redemption. Your views before the verdict?

HUMANS: EVEN IDENTICAL TWINS ARE NOT IDENTICAL

Many people argue that the human brain and eye are not attuned to see the physical differences between different animals of the same species. As it is, nature has created enormous diversity, and each individual animal can be recognized as a separate entity from the other.

A shepherd would soon be able to tell the differences between the different sheep of his herd.

Or is it really that way?

All said and done, the difference between the physical attributes of two human beings are far far more diverse than other animals. It confers on the humans a significant advantage over the other species. Even identical twins can be told from each other very simply.

An individual animal never really needed to look far different from the other one. They do differ, but the degrees of differences between animals of the same species all over the world are probably minimal, how much ever one might chose to argue (not the nutritional or environmental changes: fat/thin, light/dark may be expected of course)

Is there a specific mutation in any of the steps of the coding processes of genes into protiens which is responsible for this degree of diversity??

or is it...

a supernatural intervention??



Your views before the verdict.....

COMING SOON: THE SCIENCE REDEMPTION